City hotels have sold just 18% of available rooms between June 13, date of the first match at New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium, and July 19, when the venue hosts the World Cup final. The comparable figure this time a year ago was 26%, according to data compiled by CoStar Group Inc. earlier this month.
It’s not just New York. Boston, Vancouver and Toronto are all tracking below last year’s trends, the CoStar data shows. The host city getting the biggest boost is Dallas, where advance bookings are running 11 percentage points ahead of last year’s pace. Los Angeles and Houston are among the cities with more modest boosts.
“The World Cup doesn’t look as strong as what we had hoped,” Chris Nassetta, chief executive officer of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., said at a Semafor conference in Washington last week.
There’s still time for bookings to improve as excitement builds around the tournament. Travelers have been splashing out for years on live experiences from Taylor Swift concerts to sports, and FIFA President Gianni Infantino recently said he was “sure that all hotels will be pretty fully booked” when the festivities start.
“Ticket demand has been unprecedented,” Infantino said at the same conference where the Hilton boss spoke. “All those who buy tickets, they probably need to sleep somewhere.”
But the lagging performance so far contrasts with the hopes stoked last year when Infantino said that the tournament’s 104 matches would be like having that many Super Bowls squeezed into a little more than a month in the three host countries, the US, Canada and Mexico.
“On the nights leading up to games, we expect occupancy to be healthy and room rates to be robust,” said Jan Freitag, national director of hospitality analytics at CoStar. “But we don’t expect the impact of the World Cup to be like 104 Super Bowls.”
In a statement Thursday, the US Travel Association expressed concern about what it said was a push to discourage World Cup travel as a way of opposing Trump administration policies such as stepped-up visa fees and social media vetting.
“The notion that visiting America poses a meaningful safety risk is not a good-faith warning, it’s a political tactic designed to cause economic harm,” Geoff Freeman, the trade group’s president, said in the statement.

